I mean this is only partially true. They have 52bn in annual revenue, a lot of that from their design business which is very profitable and they have patents that are hard to value like x86. Also I'd have to do the math but $25 is probably still less than book value. Their P/B was around 0.70 last time I looked.
It’s the weekend. Market is closed. But we need some action. Let’s get a bet going on how Diddy will kill himself; a. Hanging b. Wrist slashing c. Murder by an inmate that was a 2Pac fan
yeah that's dumb, but my friend had a G Wagon and sold it because he never drives it and either A. rents a car or B takes uber/lyft. He lives in the city of course.
I'd say $25 is pretty low. That's probably lower than p/b and they won't offer less than p/b. In order to get a deal like this done the acquiring firm usually has to pay a small premium to make it attractive to shareholders.
It’s very clearly not a real ad because a) even if you don’t like the Conservatives they’re not actually stupid so wouldn’t put this out b) it’s clearly been stuck over the top of the actual ad spot rather than slotted it c) political adverts in the UK have to have an imprint on them, which is small section of text that looks something like ‘printed and promoted by A on behalf of B, both at C address’.
I actually think this particular picture is a less subtle version of a similar fake poster that said ‘we plan to cut homeless people in half by 2025’, this version has added the word ‘all’ in which makes it even more obviously fake.
In the hypothetical scenario that was a real but misworded ad it should say ‘we plan to cut homelessness in half by 2025’.