Is it actually SA if I want it?

---

[Michael J. Saylor](https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=f807be754d1cd3a2&sxsrf=ACQVn0-sC68torI2_6OKwgWMa0a9l-ehfg:1714423774537&q=Michael+Saylor&si=AKbGX_oBDfquzodaRrfbb9img4kPQ4fCBZjeqAiaW1svvC8uXqvbJMQvYeounWcAmLSYdSe06Xp6pRdGtHT5fLEsmimymOOL43HoKeTPROyw27yeXgQzJmr_NXvwcbHt0EptLXBWwrhV1hRUQx4VO1qNK_Q3KanjQ_MySH6pH-_KduS6N0z9DDso3qRVMNUgDj8RaKg2ZdMfdmym8iQmlgqp76dNDRPCAA%3D%3D&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjpj82gpuiFAxUqLzQIHVSqCzEQmxMoAHoECCkQAg)!

---

Is it? Can you share some arguments? Here's a Yale paper... Raises questions but doesn't illustrate RCV "eliminating" competitiveness. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiAq-7PlOCFAxXMCTQIHdUqAAcQFnoECDcQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fisps.yale.edu%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Ffiles%2Fdi-pb-2-3-23-v3.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3knzLK7GJalHYDsoj7cboo&opi=89978449 Excerpt: We close with a broader interpretation of our results, and how they relate to existing arguments that favor RCV’s adoption. By allowing voters to express a preference for multiple candidates, RCV implicitly helps voters to solve a coordination problem they would otherwise face in multi-candidate elections under plurality rule. For a fixed set of alternatives, this improved implicit coordination facilitates the election of moderate policies, and in particular majority-preferred policies when they exist. However, this improved implicit coordination also changes the candidates’ strategies, by opening up new pathways to electoral victory that may be absent under plurality. Changes in electoral rules therefore have the potential to create new conflicts between candidates whose consequences can be difficult to predict. Indeed, those consequences may be opposite to the aspirations of both scholars and reformers of electoral systems.

---

Yes, China has been reducing the amount of Americas debt they hold. But even before they started reducing it they didn't own much of Americas debt compared to how much extremely rich American citizens own. Today we owe like 31 trillion in debt and over 26 Trillion is held by the public with the rest being held by other countries including China. They have been reducing American debit and increasing the amount of gold they buy for like 10 years now. But they still only owned like 3% of Americas debit 10 years ago and the majority of the debit back then was held by the public. So basically America can sell it's debit to get money or they can increase taxes to get money. If it's taxes then the rich would simply have to pay more like they did before the 1980s when the top 1% were taxed at rates of 70-95% depending on the year. After the 1980s the tax rates were dropped and America got money by selling it's debt and people bought it cause America would pay interest on that debt. So super rich people instead of just having over 70% of their money just taken in taxes like what happened before the 1980s now buy America's debt and get paid their money back with interest instead of just having it taken as taxes like what used to happen. Seems like a pretty good deal for the super rich. [How much US debit does China own?](https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/080615/china-owns-us-debt-how-much.asp%23:~:text%3DChina%2520is%2520one%2520of%2520the,as%2520the%2520concept%2520of%2520money.&ved=2ahUKEwijnfTen9-FAxVbjokEHXGbBzoQFnoECA4QBQ&sqi=2&usg=AOvVaw3to3xCpPPdOKfbDBV6A6An) [Who does the US owe money to? ](https://www.marketplace.org/2023/05/26/who-does-the-u-s-owe-31-4-trillion/)

---

Men want stupid teslas and nvidia machines that do nothing but burn the planet quicker Women want luxury handbags, they also appreciate in value, smart investors unlike the regards in here. Global employment rate for women is currently 50% and much of it is part time, in MENA and South Asian countries employment rate for women is as low as 20% (Global men and also MENA/SA men = 80%) As women gain independence in these countries and all countries worldwide the number of men trying to buy their affection with birkin bags will rocket exponentially, the women who dont want that attention will use their own income to be birkin bag bossladies. Hermes calls yesterday, second best time is today.

---