Please papa. I, too, am regarded for full porting on gpu comp.

---

Big tech - 40% of their income can be stock comp. If they have been there for years and held the entire time. Do the math.

---

Atleast you have a job, Im an unemployed Comp Sci grad, so even worse 😭😭

---

People buying put contracts this week are the reason MM's are getting paid 8figure comp packages

---

if tomorrow is red i'm going to need to pawn off my wedding ring to comp my wife's boyfriend's 0DTE call options

---

Shouldn’t NVDA be drilling way more then Part of their valuation was being number 1 for the chips / gpu no and the comp wasn’t close

---

Neither will comp sci anymore apparently

---

Let’s hope all the money we are making on this ticker can comp for the ever increasing drug prices

---

Sure, but that wasn't his question. His question was why is a shorter lifespan for chips bad for earnings of NVDA. It's not bad for NVDA earnings, it's that the companies misstating the depreciation are overstating their earnings. Assuming you think the usable life is actuslly 3 years and not 5 or 6. Based on the fact that their chips from 3 years ago are still being utilized to 100% capacity due to NVDA software integration (at least according to them), I would say this worry is probably overstated. Burry's point about the stock based comp dilution is much more relevant for NVDA imo.

---

I'm just about to start experimenting with GEMINI. I used to pay for the ChatGPT pro subscription, then realized that I'm a GOOGL investor, I should be trying to pump their user numbers up and not help their comp.

---