MTG previously was a product with a huge moat - it was self-moating. It had been continually worldbuilding since it's inception. Now that it's just a vehicle to sell shit based on other IP, there's literally nothing special about it. Hasbro destroyed the moat on their own property. We've seen Palworld basically ripping off Pokemon and mostly getting away with it, Hasbro has made MTG vulnerable to some other company creating an alternative TCG that steals the rich rule system of MTG but fixes all the 'problems' it has. It could be a new TCG based on an established fantasy or sci-fi IP, or it could be an entirely newly written lore, in either case Hasbro will be absolutely fucked if/when this happens. Once MTG has a serious competitor, resale value will plummet and people will cease buying new sealed product to speculate on valuable pulls.

---

There is a small community here on Reddit that discusses a clinical trial including some that have participated... Life changing peptide and stock name is- "Nervgen". Super cheap. "The FDA confirmed in a September 2025 Type C meeting that multiple regulatory routes are available to support approval of NVG-291 as the first pharmacologic treatment for SCI" Here's a YouTube video where the CEO talks about it. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n30JB7b5i8o](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n30JB7b5i8o) YouTube to transcript link of the same video to save time. [https://www.cofyt.app/search/breakthrough-spinal-injury-drug-shows-promise-LAkYyiFfRpjUc2wSVc7fM2](https://www.cofyt.app/search/breakthrough-spinal-injury-drug-shows-promise-LAkYyiFfRpjUc2wSVc7fM2)

---

It's very easy to predict the success of AI in space. Or rather the absolute lack of any remote possibility of it. You can't cheat physics. Pretty much 100% of all the power a data center produces is converted into heat. You need to get rid of that heat somehow. Which is very easy on the surface of our planet where you can dump it into air, water or maybe even heat houses with it. Not the case in space. You need enormous radiators to slowly radiate that waste heat into the airless void outside. The ISS does it already with large radiator panels that have ammonia circulating through them, but a data center would be generating several orders of magnitude more heat. While taking up a lot less space. It's another hyperloop. It's fundamentally impossible. Even laypeople with a basic understanding of science can see it's fundamentally impossible without sci-fi levels of future tech. Somehow there will still be millions of dollars burned on this nonsense.

---

This sums up exactly why data centers in space is stupid. Musk also yapped how he will go to Mars and other scientists just said how stupid that is . Even Neil deGrasse said that if we had the technology to do something on Mars we would have technology to do much better on earth. I am trusting astrophysicist over Musk any day (So you would have heard the obvious news about SpaceX and X. Not convinced by the proposition really. Okay, let's break this down because the idea of putting a datacenter into orbit sounds amazing until you actually look at how space works. First, everyone pictures space as this freezing cold void, perfect for cooling, right? It's actually the opposite. Space is a thermodynamic prison. There's no air, so you can't just blow fans over hot components. All that insane heat from millions of processors has exactly one way out: it has to slowly radiate away as infrared light. To do that on a data-center scale, you'd need to build these gargantuan, delicate radiator panels. We're talking about a structure needing square kilometers of surface area. Like FFS imagine trying to deploy and protect a radiator the size of a small city. One analysis suggested a 5,000-megawatt facility would need about 16 square kilometers of combined solar and radiator area. For scale, that's hundreds of times bigger than the International Space Station's arrays. And that brings us to the second nightmare: space itself is trying to kill your computers. It's flooded with cosmic radiation and solar particles that constantly barrage electronics, flipping bits from 1 to 0 and corrupting data silently. * To fight it, you'd need either massively heavy shielding (which rockets hate) or * you'd have to use specialized, slower, and way more expensive "rad-hardened" chips. So you're either paying a fortune to launch a lead-lined server farm or you're not even getting top-tier computing power up there. Then there's the orbital junkyard problem. Low Earth Orbit is already cluttered with debris - old satellite parts, flecks of paint - all zipping around at about 15,000 miles per hour. Your sprawling, kilometer-wide radiator complex would be sitting in a cosmic shooting gallery. A collision with a piece of debris the size of a marble would be catastrophic, potentially creating a cloud of fragments that could take out the whole structure. But the real dream-killer is the sheer, absurd economics of it all. Let's talk launch costs. Even with reusable rockets, it's brutally expensive. At a rate of roughly $1,500 per kilogram, just launching a single, standard server rack (easily 1,000 kg or more) could cost $1.5 million... and that's before you pay for the actual servers, the solar panels, or the giant radiators. The scale is mind-boggling. One estimate suggested that to replicate just 1% of Earth's total computing capacity in orbit, you'd need to launch over twice the total mass humanity has ever sent to space in history. The numbers just don't close. The capital required would be in the trillions, all to (maybe) save on electricity bills decades from now. Now, is anyone even trying? Sure, in a very small, experimental way. Companies like Sophia Space are working on neat integrated tiles, and whispers of projects like Google's Project Suncatcher aim to send a couple of test chips up by 2027. Or even Starcloud, backed by YC. I think an Indian start-up was also there, TakeMe2Space, IIRC. But I'm not convinced. The smart money is on solving those problems where they exist: better nuclear reactors, advanced geothermal, and just building data centers in cooler places on Earth. The orbital data center is a fantastic backdrop for a sci-fi movie, but for the foreseeable future, that's exactly where it belongs.) stolen

---

Look up Dyson sphere, it’s a sci-fi concept on harnessing a stars energy

---