Almost 2 Years Ago
14 Min Read

At firstsquawk, NFTs, and Stock Lending are trending on Reddit today



At firstsquawk is the topic seeing the strongest uptrend in chatter on Wallstreetbets today. Here's what's being said:

ruum-502 - 85 upvotes - source
DO WE NEED MORE EVIDENCE THAT COMPUTERSHARE IS THE ONLY FINANCIAL INSTITUTION THAT LISTENS TO US?!?? Sorry for caps but after seeing 6 posts at top shitting on Computershare it’s needed.

Peter_Rodrigues1986 - 26 upvotes - source
Anyone else been buying shares since Jan 21', spends all day on superstonk and still doesn't understand a damn thing about the stock market but still gets Jacked every damn day? New DD? Sure why the hell not. Upvotes New floor price of 100m? Hell yeah! Upvotes Really I couldn't explain anything to anyone if they asked. I just want to be able to nap at 2pm everyday

Same-Tour9465 - 19 upvotes - source
**FUD DEBUNKED** - **Computer Share new limit sell limits**: While current limit sell limit has been decreased, that's honestly irrelevant as when the price rises, so does the max limit order limit. You can put in an order of +/- 3% of the current ticker price. For example; >**So if the stock was trading at 9,050,000 you aren’t restricted to doing a limit order for $3500. You could do one for between 8,416,500 - 9,321,500. The $3500 is only in place now because we are still pretty far from it.** Problem was never a problem. You can still get those phone number prices. Market orders are a big no no still, however. - **Computer Share "meme stock" email**: Within 12 hours of announcing new email that felt both out of touch and a tad fuddy, ComputerShare stopped advertising it, apologized, and announced a new email for customer service needs. It's now **DRS@computershare.com**. So we've defeated the CS limit sell limit misinformation scare, completely really the CS email fiasco, now let's just focus on what really matters today... the Split dividend, otherwise called the Splividend!

djsneak666 - 18 upvotes - source
It gives a small glimpse in to how they view us at computershare tho

SeanPatrick20 - 17 upvotes - source
Putin could drop a Nuke on the west and the markets would still go up at this point

ghostcrook - 16 upvotes - source
Goddamn people are spooked about all this $3500 news. I haven't even thought about trying to figure out how to sell through Computershare yet. Thinking I'll spend enough time fucking around how on to sell when the time comes will only guarantee selling at the peak'ish. A smoothbrain strategem.

Tartooth - 15 upvotes - source
last price shows 1.2 million, you do a market order, fills at $320 "WTF" you say, "CRIME" No crime, just how NBBO works. If theres no buy offers then...

off_by_two - 13 upvotes - source
Its barely a dump at all

crumad - 12 upvotes - source
Can't wait for to buy again at $69.69. **I'll-Fuckin-do-it-again.jpg**

fshinetop - 12 upvotes - source
Totally insignificant, according to coinmarketcap that exchange is a total joke. [Just look at the volume for all the coins they support.](https://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/coinmate/) who wants to trade those markets? They should just shut down entirely. Edit: has this account been bought specifically to dig up some obscure BCH delisting announcements and post it here? For years this user was posting exclusively (in Portuguese) on a Brazilian sports club sub and all of a sudden they decide to post in /r/btc and their first post is this?
 

9.1 is another popular topic. Comments for that:


100-basis-points - 19 upvotes - source
YOU SAID 9.1% INFLATION? ASS GDP? LAYOFFS? YEAH OK. +5% QQQ

Valkanaa - 13 upvotes - source
I'm not a medical man but that figure seems well above 9.1%

RCotti - 12 upvotes - source
They beat inflation by -5%? Or did you forget that they converted their bitcoin back to usd which is now worth 9.1% less than when they bought it

the_spiritual_eye - 12 upvotes - source
The fucked up thing is that the governments are intentionally fudging the figures so people don’t rise up and overthrow their broken system. There’s no way “real” inflation is just 5% or fucking 9.1% What garbage are they including to indicate such a low figure? Cost of Diesel doubled at the pump compared to just last year. Landlords were forcing tenants to cop $50-$100 weekly increases BEFORE interest rates started going up. What other fucking metrics are there? Where do these people think we are spending our money?

1villageidiot - 9 upvotes - source
9.1% CPI ![img](emote|t5_2th52|4260)

1villageidiot - 8 upvotes - source
9.1% CPI. BOOM!

mpoozd - 8 upvotes - source
CPI 9.1% inflation all time high Market: Nah, it's fine AAPL GOOGL pausing new hires Market: holyshit, this's serious

DestraD - 8 upvotes - source
Big Rate cuts WUT? The 27th is a rate hike and inflation was just reported at 9.1% a 75 basis points will just dent inflation.

AxemanFromMA - 7 upvotes - source
This shit gonna dump, fomc next week, 100 bps to combat 9.1% inflation incoming

Berto_ - 6 upvotes - source
Was 9.1%
 

Nft is seeing an increase in chatter as well. Comments below:



Sportsman180 - 681 upvotes - source
Why in the FUCK is Gamestop's official transfer agent calling it "memestocks"? Are you fucking kidding me? RC can you give us the NFT dividend so we can get paid and stop dealing with these jokers?

made_by_sota - 438 upvotes - source
Every SOTA NFT gives its holder a right to purchase unique 1:1 physical skateboard with his / her art on it ❤ so the answer is YES 🥳

michaellargent - 436 upvotes - source
FFS, at this point, can I issue an NFT dividend to my fellow GameStop shareholders? Just call it an *exclusive* *airdrop* RC

Jolly_Work_7730 - 294 upvotes - source
so NFT dividend possible?

MozerfuckerJones - 168 upvotes - source
1 week of GameStop NFT Marketplace volume > 3 months of Coinbase NFT marketplace 😂

whatwhyisthisating - 163 upvotes - source
Short answer: yes. Long answer: NFTs are non-fungible (can't be replicated). In order to deliver a share, they can't force cash onto you--cause that is forcing you to report your taxes. They actually have to go out into the market, find the company's share, buy it, then deliver it your wallet, no matter the cost. Why? An NFT is a smart contract that can now be legally defensible and a company is within their rights to go after anyone who is not willing to deliver the share. In this case, GameStop is well within their rights to sue a short seller who does not deliver an NFT share (dividend), along with the fact that, with a sooner than later launch of a fully functioning marketplace, this NFT has a legitimate use case. A 1:1 NFT dividend, from one company, right now, is enough to extinguish all of Wall Street. Leave it to GameStop to keep it business as usual. shorts r ded. gg no re Edit to include this thought: If the rumors of a spin-off from merger and acquisition is true, this is starting with shares you don't have. If everyone got an NFT dividend for a completely new company and there aren't enough NFTs from a new company to go around, ooooohhh boy, shorts are beyond fucked--they will cease to exist after this. There will be queues of people waiting on that new company share and by the time it is delivered to them, it could be well after it's sold for phone number prices. A spin-off NFT will wipe out all shorts. None of them will be left. This is not an asteroid killing the dinosaurs, this is an Earth cracking kill shot on a crime enterprise on a global scale.

YVR_Sex - 157 upvotes - source
Tesla, Rivian, coinbase, NFT this, crypto that... Sounds more like a crash in the bullshit sector than anything. These are just bubbles that couldn't exist without 0% interest rates.

Criand - 147 upvotes - source
**HI!** **BILLY MAYS HERE** for the **GME Stock Splitidend**. The **ULTIMATE** share tool that puts a **razor's edge** on **dull shares** that are being held down low. The secret to the GME Stock Splitidend is the **tungsten-carbide NFT Marketplace**, along with its unique angle that give you a precision **4-to-1 cut** each and every time. Fidelity, TDAmeritrade, Robinhood, Schwab… these are the things that dull your GME. **This GME** is so dull, it won’t even split this much! But with the Stock Splitidend, it’s as easy as one, two, three, and **FOUR** and you get professional results each and every time! When it comes to splitting stocks, ordinary splits are **tough** to use. But whether your share count is big or small, the Stock Splitidend **sharpens them all**! If you’re an outdoorsman, take it with you when you go hunting or fishing to keep bugging your family and friends about GME. Just take it out and demonstrate **the power of the shares splitting apart!** ^^^^wowthankspleasestopcriandthisisthefourthtimeyoubroughtupgmethisweek Call now and we’ll send you a stock for **only $158.75**. Ordinary Stocks would only give you one share for that price. But through this exclusive TV offer of the Stock Splitidend we'll send you not one, not two, but **FOUR** for the price of one! **CALL NOW!**

G0dabumbumslappy - 104 upvotes - source
( Allow adding of CUSTOM tokens when prompted from a dApp. ) This is FU€KING IT!!! ! ! ! 🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀 NFT motherfucking dividend after the split!!! 🏴‍☠️ S H F ☠️ F U € K E D ☠️ EDIT: A decentralised application (DApp,[1] dApp,[2] Dapp, or dapp) is an application that can operate autonomously, typically through the use of smart contracts, that runs on a decentralized computing, blockchain or other distributed ledger system.[3] Like traditional applications, DApps provide some function or utility to its users. However, unlike traditional applications, DApps operate without human intervention and are not owned by any one entity, rather DApps distribute tokens that represent ownership.[3][4] These tokens are distributed according to a programmed algorithm to the users of the system, diluting ownership and control of the DApp.[4] Without any one entity controlling the system, the application becomes decentralised.🍾🐲🐉🏴‍☠️🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🌝 Edit continued: Decentralised applications have been popularised by distributed ledger technologies (DLT), such as the Ethereum blockchain, on which DApps are built, amongst other public blockchains.[5] The trustless and transparent nature of DApps have led to greater developments in the utilisation of these features within the decentralized finance (DeFi) space.[6] DApps are divided into 17 categories: exchanges, games, finance, gambling, development, storage, high-risk, wallet, governance, property, identity, media, social, security, energy, insurance, and health. 🎤👋

HANDSOMEHISOKA - 98 upvotes - source
Probably just the same guy, which would be the point of the NFT
 

7/22 is another popular topic. Here's what they're saying:



Nice-Violinist-6395 - 1524 upvotes - source
Honestly? I don’t think this is as bad or fucky (FUDy?) as people think it is. It is a harbinger of the MOASS? **Absolutely.** But let’s say you had a share of BRK/A ($~400,000/share) on ComputerShare. If you were trying to place a limit sell order, would they restrict you to $3500? Of course not. The limit sell price is *based on the underlying share price.* No one except us has enough information to know that GME is going to catapult past $1m/share. With that in mind, we can’t expect them to act accordingly. But once the price is actually in the 7-digit ballpark, I have no doubt that CS will adjust their limits. Why? Because they’re not a fucking brokerage. They’re a transfer agent — who will now be in charge of the most valuable company in the history of Wall Street. Life is good, folks. *Life is good.*

SegmentedMoss - 200 upvotes - source
You mean your pay cut was 7%

RedOctobrrr - 106 upvotes - source
So they're anticipating an inability to secure those 3 additional shares. The dividend shares should be distributed after hours tomorrow (Thurs 7/21) and already be in peoples' accounts come Friday morning. This basically says they're not sure if they'll have the shares Thurs night.

aspergillum - 67 upvotes - source
> ZionOil & Gas, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“we,” “our,” “Zion” or the “Company”) isan oil and gas exploration company with a history of 22 years of oil & gas exploration in Israel. As of March 31, 2022, the Company has no revenues from its oil and gas operations 22 years of gas and oil exploration and they've not found a dime of revenue. Not profits, just revenue.

Sugardevil27 - 62 upvotes - source
For me T-38 is the 26th of July. There were trading holidays on 6/19 and 7/4.

VaultBoy3 - 60 upvotes - source
She probably woulda left and still kept her 7 figures

Ghola_Mentat - 48 upvotes - source
He’s obsessed with the stock price. You must not follow him at all. I’ve been a shareholder for 6 or 7 years now so I try to keep up with his shenanigans. Had to cut down because I’m freaking sick of the guy and it’s a long term hold anyway.

Sioned-Song - 46 upvotes - source
A wave of DRS after the split and before 7/31 will show up on the next quarterly report when GME reports the official DRS count.

nigerdaumus - 41 upvotes - source
At this rate, if TSLA declared chapter 7 bankruptcy tomorrow the price would double.

Get-It-Got - 34 upvotes - source
I tried eTrade twice but ultimately canceled and ACT'd to Fidelity because in each case it was taking 5+ business days and I was being given a timeline of 3-5 weeks. Heard similar stories about other broker too, although I've ultimately only DRS'd from Fidelity and Vanguard ... Fidelity has never taken more than 4 business days, and Vanguard took 6 or 7 business days.
 

390 is another popular topic. Here's what they're saying:



Prudent_Ad_7288 - 65 upvotes - source
JPow will do the full one point. [Source](https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/040/390/cover2.jpg)

darksoulsrolls - 11 upvotes - source
Not at all, they absolutely will not care hedging. Now that's not to say in its entirety it won't be hedge, but a majority of it won't. They've done it plenty of times in the past, and carried out their supposed hedging into following weeks. The spy from 6/17 to 6/24 ran from ~362 to ~390, the gex was enormous and was supposed to have an impact market wide, but nothing happened. The following week the spy dropped to half the value of the previous week on the same gamma data. Which means all those billions meant to be covered were ignored, market wide, and then dismissed entirely. Currently all call volume for this week was killed on the 160 bounce. Gamma dropped heavily and most data had call volume going into August instead. The next couple of weeks shows nothing but a slump of put volume and a desolate call chain. So the price is looking to repeat its old patterns and drop heavily post split. Which is that's the case, the MM knows and doesn't care to hedge. Hence why our supposed hedging volume is barely 3 million, given the gex data

Facebook_Friend1 - 9 upvotes - source
Wow 6k to 38k buying 60 july 22 390 calls a couple days ago at .99 a pop. Just sold for 6.30 a pop. All in Jan 23 $430 spy calls now. Make me rich 🤞🤞🤞

ThatsAHugeLoadOfBS - 7 upvotes - source
The best part is when they’re wrong. “A lot of resistance at 390 but if we hit 391 it’s going to break out and I’m all in.” Proceeds to hit 391 then dip right back down.

Steaklegend - 6 upvotes - source
Every fade is weaker than the last Remember this post. $390 tomorrow $398 by Friday close

Realistic-Duck632 - 5 upvotes - source
I bought 100 spy 390 put 0dte when we were at 395. Am I regard?

ohnoitsjmo - 4 upvotes - source
We’ll see SPY $500 before we ever see $390 again ![img](emote|t5_2th52|4271)

Kenz0Cree - 3 upvotes - source
Dropping to 390 then crawling back up to 393 by eod

mcccliii - 3 upvotes - source
400 or 390. All on tsla

Jasond777 - 2 upvotes - source
please tell me you did not switch to calls at 390 or higher
 

Abe is another popular topic. Here's what they're saying:


lordbell21 - 1 upvotes - source
Japan has been green since the Abe situation it feels like
 

Stock lending is another popular topic. Here's what they're saying:


Critical_Lurker - 1284 upvotes - source
Never sell via Market Order holy fuck me!! We need a sticky post explaining why it's literally the first thing you learn when selling a stock! Edit: CS says they will raise or even remove the limitations on Limit Orders when the price increases.

GoatsGoHome - 447 upvotes - source
Yes - gonna copypasta my comment from elsewhere in the thread for visibility. ​ >It's INSANELY important that we crush this idea that "It’s only a limit on LIMIT orders. You can still execute market orders at higher prices." (point 1 in OP's post). > >A trade has two sides: A SELLER that puts an ASKING price into the order book, and a BUYER that puts a BID into the order book. A trade only happens when a SELLER's ASKING price is lower than what someone (the BUYER) is willing to pay (the BID). This sets the ""price"" of the stock, when that trade executes at the intersection between these two sides. > >When a BUYER puts in a MARKET order, it means they will pay ANY AMOUNT to execute that trade. That means the trade will execute against the lowest ASK value any seller has in the order book from their LIMIT sells. This is the situation for MOASS - we're putting LIMIT SELLs at $100M (or whatever floor), and the forced-liquidations are executing MARKET BUYS against those "ASKING prices". > >If, during MOASS, you're foolish enough to see the ""price"" (read: last executed trade) at $100M and say "hey I should MARKET-SELL cause that's the price of the stock", you're gonna be in a WORLD of hurt. It's very likely that the next BID in the order book from a prospective BUYER is something like $400. Who's gonna be putting LIMIT BUY orders for $80M+ during MOASS?? Your MARKET SELL will search for the highest bid in the order book to match with and execute the trade. Next thing you know you've sold your prized possessions for nanopennies on the dollar. > >I've seen this rhetoric several times on the sub with respect to the CS sell limits - that it doesn't affect market orders. > >THIS IS DANGEROUS. DO NOT MARKET SELL DURING MOASS - YOU WILL MOST LIKELY END UP WITH (relatively speaking) NOTHING!

ProfessorHermit - 369 upvotes - source
My big takeaway from the post. Limit orders will increase if the stock value demands it. Fuuuuck market orders.

GoatsGoHome - 60 upvotes - source
Gonna copypasta again from my comment in that thread: It's INSANELY important that we crush this idea that "It’s only a limit on LIMIT orders. You can still execute market orders at higher prices." (point 1 in OP's post). A trade has two sides: A SELLER that puts an ASKING price into the order book, and a BUYER that puts a BID into the order book. A trade only happens when a SELLER's ASKING price is lower than what someone (the BUYER) is willing to pay (the BID). This sets the ""price"" of the stock, when that trade executes at the intersection between these two sides. When a BUYER puts in a MARKET order, it means they will pay ANY AMOUNT to execute that trade. That means the trade will execute against the lowest ASK value any seller has in the order book from their LIMIT sells. This is the situation for MOASS - we're putting LIMIT SELLs at $100M (or whatever floor), and the forced-liquidations are executing MARKET BUYS against those "ASKING prices". If, during MOASS, you're foolish enough to see the ""price"" (read: last executed trade) at $100M and say "hey I should MARKET-SELL cause that's the price of the stock", you're gonna be in a WORLD of hurt. It's very likely that the next BID in the order book from a prospective BUYER is something like $400. Who's gonna be putting LIMIT BUY orders for $80M+ during MOASS?? Your MARKET SELL will search for the highest bid in the order book to match with and execute the trade. Next thing you know you've sold your prized possessions for nanopennies on the dollar. I've seen this rhetoric several times on the sub with respect to the CS sell limits - that it doesn't affect market orders. THIS IS DANGEROUS. DO NOT MARKET SELL DURING MOASS - YOU WILL MOST LIKELY END UP WITH (relatively speaking) NOTHING!

nameless-manager - 57 upvotes - source
From their site, looks like they are preparing for high numbers. Looks like they think are getting ready for GME to spike to $10mil. They raised the max trade value for GME to $10 mil and left everything else at $2 mil. What is affected by maximum limit order change? The change applies to both “day” limit orders and “good-till-cancelled” limit orders. Any existing orders with a limit above $3,500 per share will remain in place until they naturally expire or on the execution of a stock split, when such orders are routinely cancelled. Any resubmitted or new orders after close of business on Wednesday, July 20, 2022 will be subject to the new maximum limit of $3,500 per share.  The change does not affect the maximum trade value (consideration) that our system will accept. The maximum consideration will remain at $10 million for designated securities (specifically GameStop and some other stock) and $2 million for other securities for each individual order submitted via the web [Computershare FAQ. ](https://www.computershare.com/us/becoming-a-registered-shareholder-in-us-listed-companies)

Humongousfungus1313 - 55 upvotes - source
Hi. Can you explain this to me ?? I have all my shares drs to computer share - first time investor only invested in gme. When you say do not do a market order under any circumstance what do you mean ? If all my shares are in çs and I want to sell them during moss’ you suggest setting a limit order instead of directly selling them using the sell button through cs? I’m having a hard time keeping up as I’m a farmer and cultivator and spend very little time on the internet because I’m so busy. I’ve been invested from the beginning but have dropped off Paying attention as work load has increased. Are you saying if the moss’s happens and I try to sell my shares through cs using the sell button function I might screw myself ?? Please explain Edit : did some reading … from what I THINK I understand .. the reason a market order is suspect over a limit order is that a market order will go to execution based on time. It will execute in the shortest amount of time not set on price abd not necessarily at the price the stock was at when you executed the order. Your order could get purposefully or accidentally put into a sort of que and then scooped up and actually bought during moments of raid upward or downward movement when the price is much lower. If you set up and execute a limit order it won’t actually sell or go through until it can be acquired for the actual price you set a limit for. This may take longer but guarantees the price is set where you designate. Currently cs changed the sell limit order to 3500 but this would likely change as the actual price of the stock rises from what I gathered so the play would be to not set a sell limit until the price approaches your floor and the çs limit cap has risen to reflect the current price. I’m so retarted and poor I live off grid and eat my food from the earth so don’t listen to a word I say or take financial advice from me and please correct me if I’m way off base !

pancaf - 45 upvotes - source
At age 17-18 I had a few thousand saved up from birthday/christmas money and things like that. My parents told me to buy CD's because that is how they invested their extra cash and they didn't know shit about the stock market. Interest rates were around 5% at the time so it wasn't that bad. This was around 2004-2005. I started working and saving a lot more money. Someone at my bank suggested mutual funds so I did that and made like 10-15% after a year. While that was going on I was watching the stock market and watching some stocks go up 5% a day. So I'm thinking "wtf am I doing making 15% a year when I can make 5% a day??" At this point I'm now working as a bank teller making $10.50 an hour, age 20, about 20k saved up. It's early October 2007. I get rid of my mutual funds and buy all these stocks that I saw going up almost every day. The next day I'm up about 1k and I'm like "shit let's put some on margin so I can make even more". I was profitable for literally just one day. Then the great recession happens. I spend the next several months using my paycheck to cover margin calls. Eventually it wasn't enough and I was forced to liquidate some multiple times. I ended up losing my initial 20k plus about 10k that I was depositing to cover margin calls. I had about 1-2k left when I threw in the towel. I told myself I'm never investing in stocks again. I'm only doing safe things like money market funds, etc. But I was still fascinated by stocks and watched the market while at work and learned what I could. A couple years later I started learning about options. It was mid 2011 at the time and I had about 20k saved up again. 10k in a taxable brokerage and 10k in an ira. I learned about VXX and contango and how it is likely to continue going down long term so I thought I had the perfect plan, sell naked calls. Somehow I got approved to do this at think or swim with very little experience and only a 10k account. I even had my brother open an account for 10k and I did it in his as well. I was doing them super far out of the money and figured I was safe because of that. I was making a couple hundred a week and it worked pretty well for a few weeks. Then the crazy volatility event started where over 3 months VXX went up by about 200% and the stock market dropped something like 25%. This was when there was talk of the US debt possibly getting downgraded by one of the ratings agencies. I ended up losing my 10k and going slightly negative even though VXX never got to my strike. Most of it was gone from one crazy day and I got a flat tire the same day on top of that. It felt like the worst day of my life. My position size was way too high. My brother's account almost went negative too. All I had left was 10k in my roth ira. Luckily you can't sell naked calls in those otherwise that likely would have been gone too. Shortly after that I graduated college and got a job at charles schwab. I started investing smarter. Buying and holding quality names. I still lost some on stupid options trades here and there but I never let it wipe me out like before. As time went on I started doing less and less stupid trades. While talking to clients for 9 years I saw it all and learned a lot from other people's mistakes and successes. I ended up retiring at age 33 with a net worth of around 750k. Now at age 35 my net worth is around 1.5 million. A large part of that gain the last 2 years was my 2 homes in Austin increasing in value. Learn from your mistakes. You still have a looong life ahead of you. I lost it all multiple times and now have all the money I will ever need at a really young age. If you know what you're doing and have a decent paying job you can start over and get rich like I did. If I knew then what I know now I could have probably retired 3-5 years sooner. Feel free to message me or reply with any questions

markaurel121 - 43 upvotes - source
Good that they change the email address. We are not investing in a "meme stock", the DD on GME is rock solid.

GoatsGoHome - 41 upvotes - source
It's INSANELY important that we crush this idea that "It’s only a limit on LIMIT orders. You can still execute market orders at higher prices." (point 1 in OP's post). A trade has two sides: A SELLER that puts an ASKING price into the order book, and a BUYER that puts a BID into the order book. A trade only happens when a SELLER's ASKING price is lower than what someone (the BUYER) is willing to pay (the BID). This sets the ""price"" of the stock, when that trade executes at the intersection between these two sides. When a BUYER puts in a MARKET order, it means they will pay ANY AMOUNT to execute that trade. That means the trade will execute against the lowest ASK value any seller has in the order book from their LIMIT sells. This is the situation for MOASS - we're putting LIMIT SELLs at $100M (or whatever floor), and the forced-liquidations are executing MARKET BUYS against those "ASKING prices". If, during MOASS, you're foolish enough to see the ""price"" (read: last executed trade) at $100M and say "hey I should MARKET-SELL cause that's the price of the stock", you're gonna be in a WORLD of hurt. It's very likely that the next BID in the order book from a prospective BUYER is something like $400. Who's gonna be putting LIMIT BUY orders for $80M+ during MOASS?? Your MARKET SELL will search for the highest bid in the order book to match with and execute the trade. Next thing you know you've sold your prized possessions for nanopennies on the dollar. I've seen this rhetoric several times on the sub with respect to the CS sell limits - that it doesn't affect market orders. THIS IS DANGEROUS. DO NOT MARKET SELL DURING MOASS - YOU WILL MOST LIKELY END UP WITH (relatively speaking) NOTHING!

Ms_Mosa - 37 upvotes - source
It could be argued that this stock has been researched more than any stock ever. And, we (as individual investors) are more dialed into a company than any shareholders ever.
 

Futes is another popular topic. Here's what they're saying:


bearhunter429 - 12 upvotes - source
Futes going straight to zero. SPY might get delisted tomorrow.

SmallCapsOnly - 12 upvotes - source
If you refer to futures as “futes” then I lose all respect for anything you have to say.

bearhunter429 - 11 upvotes - source
And futes open with a HUGE gap down just as I predicted. bul r fuk

LightBoyRick69 - 11 upvotes - source
Roses are Red, Violets are Blue, Futes are 🌈, and I'm Fucked

YKI_Evade - 9 upvotes - source
# FUTES RIPPING

Hernand27 - 9 upvotes - source
If i see 🌽 shoot up tonight then I’ll believe the futes are legit

stock_dude9 - 8 upvotes - source
Wow futes mega red. RIP stock market: 2020-2022

SolitaireyEgg - 8 upvotes - source
too red too early buying futes

Elite4Derek96 - 8 upvotes - source
futes almost green and bears are guaranteeing a big red day tomorrow

ohnoitsjmo - 8 upvotes - source
wtf futes were down 1% an hour ago and now they’re green??