I see this narrative around a lot and I don't quite get it. I get how you have high revenues based on deal making but isn't that offsetby expenditures if you're doing a circular seal?
Lets say we have companies A, B, C doing the circle thing. A gives B 10$ for a deal, B gives C the 10$ they got for a deal, then C makes a deal with A, giving A 10$ for the deal.
While each company is receiving 10$ on the deal, they're also spending their 10$ on the next deal. So isn't all their net profit 0?
Here’s my logic, bank stocks are going to all come in and say the money is magic and stocks aren’t real.
Then JPM, GS, and WFC are all going to say we are trying to bail out America because it’s too big to Fail.., which will spook investors and then they will say.
The tariffs are working, but we are getting ass fucked by China still so we need to invest in America we are crumbling.
This will then send the rocket into the ocean exploding, creating a tidal wave of massive regarded proportions. This will scare investors and make then run to their bunkers selling everything.
Trump will tweet on social truth that he is a major proponent of his tariffs and loves to hit things with things stick, so investors will rally behind this from their bunkers, selling everything because they know it means another 100% tariffs on China is coming and he’s about to give them Taiwan as a peace offering so we can get his Nobel peace prize.