If you haven't read 1929 by Sorkin you really should. In all seriousness little has changed in 100 years, it's amusing hearing they had the same arguments bulls vs bears, wanting the fed to ease up monetary policy to support their bullshit speculation, highly leveraged margins, even retail was for the first time a big factor as normal people were heavily invested in the markets for the first time. It also has a happy ending with heavy karma though also like today it was mostly the middle and lower classes who paid the price and the people at the top just kind of laughed it off, what's losing several million when you have several more left, after all?

---

vs Netflix, which is better then?

---

WHO DO YOU THINK WILL REIGN VICTOR? Netflix Vs Paramount

---

So it’s no longer team green vs team red It’s team green vs team GOOG

---

here comes the mother of all Vs

---

So CVNA has now a PE of 102 and forward PE of 75. Gonna tripple its profits vs. guidance and it‘s still overvalued. Lol.

---

The split occurs before the acquisition. Current WBD stockholders will get shares of both the discovery and WB stocks when it splits, and then the WB stock holders get the cash and stock from Netflix when that acquisition occurs. So this isn’t $27.75 vs $30. It’s a split, and then 27.75 for the studios and hbo side of the split, Versus $30 for no split.

---

Europump vs Ameridump

---

Counterpoint, more smaller companies means more $14.99/month subscriptions.   The Disney/Hulu/ESPN packages for instance are a steal compared to old cable prices and has way more content. The simplicity of delivering content over the internet VS owning the lines and charging whatever has changed the game.  The dinosaurs have no moat anymore. We also have more small media companies than ever before.  Not long ago we had "the big 3".  

---

you guys got anymore of them Vs?

---