the 'sea of red' charts are pointless. Most of the time when there is a 'sea of red chart' - the stocks are down by just a few percent on average because the US dollar has strengthened ever so slightly. Show the SP500 chart since 1900 instead and notice how tiny the recent blip down is

---

Is there a slight chance that tomorrow isn’t the sea red that we all think it will be?

---

I sold my IBIT puts before end of day and locked in over 100% gain. The one green thing in a sea of red

---

Costco standing high above the sea of red, staring down at my peasant ass

---

META green in this sea of red? WTF!

---

I had to read the article/paragraph a few times the other day to make sure I hadn't misread it. I couldn't believe. Data Centers. In. Space. His core reason? Unlimited solar energy. First, and foremost, a core requirement of datacenters is stability and reliability. This is achieved through redundancy. Many drives, many processors, many memory sticks, many wires. This all weighs a FUCK TON. And putting stuff in space..... costs a FUCK TON. I threw the following into ChatGPT: *Based on the average cost per pound to put objects into space (satellites), and the difference in power a single solar panel can generate in space per day (full time sun and higher intensity), along with the average electrical consumption of a data center (relative to how much power a panel can make up there and how many panels would be required), how long would it take to break even putting a data center in space versus keeping it on earth with solar panels* It basically said that a datacenter in space would have to run for more than a decade to JUST break even. That doesn't even account for the difficulties of getting a person up there to fix an issue if something breaks (Memory sticks /etc die all the time. I imagine that it will be more frequent in a harsh environment such as space). Also, a data center would be a large target for a small piece of space debris. With all the land/space available, rather than building a large solar array on earth (make it bigger and he could be a utility provider selling energy off to a surrounding area) , he wants to build a somewhat smaller one and lift all that into space and hope it doesn't break. I work in enterprise data systems. Shit breaks. A lot. His other reasons? Scalability (Space in space), Grid Relief, and Thermal Control: "Unlimited Space" . Yeah, no it's not unlimited. There's a lot, sure. At varying altitudes. But its VERY expensive to get there, stay there, and fix things that break there. Outages can be long in worst case scenarios. It would be easier, and cheaper, to put it on an old (or hell, brand new), oil rig platform in the ocean and utilize solar, wind, and ocean wave powered sources of energy for it. That would take power off residential/commercial grids. And you could literally pump sea water through radiators for better thermal control. It's been a while, but I feel like I recall that thermal control is kinda challenging in the vacuum of space. This is all a stupid fucking idea perpetrated by a person with the emotional and intellectual maturity of a toothpick.

---

SPY looking like a sea depth chart.

---

How TF is SNDK green in a sea of red 🤣

---

Sailor lol must live at sea!

---

in a sea of red tsm is green

---