Google please swap P/E ratio with Tesla

---

in EVERY case historically, if you brought the S&P 500 at a 23x P/E (it's currently at 25.7x), your annualized return over the next 10yrs was between +2% and -2%, which, *adjusted for inflation*, is negative. 

---

They already put up 10m of revenue this quarter without any contracts. Government is not their only source but it will reprice this company. They aren’t profitable yet so P/E is meaningless. Like I said, they are guiding for 110m revenue next year and the CEO wouldn’t say this if it wasn’t true. Just look at EPS and revenue growth over the past year. The numbers don’t lie.

---

Wait Berkshire Hathaway reveals a new position in the alphabet? So it's like a b c d Berkshire Hathaway e f g? 

---

If google - a company with a suite of money printing products, the clear leaders in self driving cars, and hundreds of trillions of data points about nearly every human on earth - had the same P/E as Tesla, GOOG would be >$2,800/share. OpenAI has interesting tech and popularized LLMs, sure, but it’s no longer unique or best in class and Enterprise seems to be going with Anthropic or Gemini because OAI hasn’t exactly demonstrated itself to be super trustworthy. Enterprise or data is where the money is, and Google has the market cornered on at least Data.

---

Manager be saying that I can’t wear my Chuck-E-Cheese costume to the strip club and I told him nah fuck that I don’t care how many people see me in there I gotta smell my farts all day in this thing and Jasmine gives me a discount on lap dances if I’m wearing it and he was like hmmm okay fine 👍 

---

This seems interesting, but some things to think about: One or two (or three) DoD contracts is great but does it really warrant such a high P/E ratio? No idea on the actual size or structure of those contracts and having the DoD be your main and only customer is obviously risky. Also his comments are a bit wish-washy and he obviously wants to portray a high degree of optimism; throwing out “maybe two or three” doesn’t get him in any sort of trouble but is sales-y.

---

waaah apes 🦧 gold hands to e secret Brazil Illuminati we fold even with 20x dilution

---

will e-commerce tag out AI once the new pandemic lockdown drops

---

Here's the example : You are narrowing it down perfectly! Since the only word that satisfied the previous constraints was LOTES, and LOTES contains an 'S', it must now be excluded. Constraint Check for LOTES (L O T E S): * Contains L, O, T, E: Yes * 'S' in the word: Yes (5th letter) * Must be excluded: Yes Conclusion Based on all the constraints you have provided: * Must be a 5-letter word. * Must contain L, O, T, and E. * 'L' is not the 2nd letter. * 'E' is not the last letter. * There is no 'S' in the word (meaning the fifth letter is not 'S'). There are no common English words that fit all of these constraints. The words from the initial list failed because: * BLOTE, CLOTE, ELOTE, FLOTE, SLOTE, ZLOTE failed constraint #4 ('E' is the last letter). * LOTES failed constraint #5 (it contains an 'S'). Would you like to try a different combination of letters, or perhaps relax one of the constraints (e.g., allow a 6-letter word, or allow 'E' to be the last letter)? The word was MOTEL.

---