Look at the candles, MACD and RSI

---

blasting RSI above 70 just to get a little above VWAP isn't bullish. jfc. This is tanking by eod

---

He’s right you know. RSI is hitting bottom and there’s a bullish bat harmonic

---

Bullish bat and RSI bottom lining up for a big recovery, back up from here

---

what u see? oil? rsi?

---

Some yall need to step back and learn to read a chart, have a strict rule on entering and exiting or not entering at all if it’s choppy and be disciplined.. ..take accountability, don’t gamble and don’t risk more than you can afford. I’m not perfect by far but I learn from every mistake and haven’t taken the time out to learn price action, volume, MacD and RSI

---

4 years of TA, Fundamentals, and Meme stocks. My conclusion? It’s just gambling with extra steps I’ve been in the markets for about four years now, and I’ve gone from "gambling" on meme codes to "studying" every indicator under the sun. My takeaway? The more I learn the more I’m convinced that passive indexing is the only rational move. I started out completely clueless like everyone else. My first two trades were pure WallStreetBets-style nonsense that I panicked and closed almost immediately. Then, I got lucky. I bought "safe" names like Google, Spotify, and Nvidia, held them for a few weeks or months, and walked away with a profit. Looking back, I had no idea what I was doing; it was just a massive bull market and pure luck. Then came the "gambling" phase—chasing Meme Stocks, winning some, losing some. After that, I decided to get "serious" and learn technical analysis. I started day trading TSLL (the leveraged Tesla ETF), trying to spot support and resistance levels. There were days when it actually worked, and I thought I’d finally cracked the code. Then the luck ran out, the losses piled up, and I realized I was just gambling with a fancier name. So I went deep. I read John Murphy from cover to cover. I mastered moving averages, MACD, RSI, and even complex volume analysis. In hindsight, the charts look like a roadmap. In real-time? They’re worthless. They describe the past in 20 different ways, but they have zero predictive power. I used to think fundamental analysis was the answer, but the market is too efficient. By the time I finish reading a financial report, the "smart money" has already moved the goalposts. These firms hire thousands of people to do this 24/7—I can’t compete with that. The only thing that still feels like it might have some substance is Quantitative Analysis. But even there, I’m skeptical. Is there actually a path for a retail investor to build a math-based edge that isn't immediately crushed by institutional algorithms? Or is "Quant" just the latest buzzword we use to feel sophisticated while we're actually just overcomplicating a coin flip? Is it even worth the energy for swing or day trading, or is it just another rabbit hole? Be honest with me: Is anyone here actually beating the S&P 500 year after year? Or are we all just chasing ghosts, using the same tired indicators as everyone else, and just making our brokers rich with commissions? I'm starting to think that unless you're a math genius with a supercomputer, you're better off just buying the S&P 500 and reclaiming your life. I’d love to hear from anyone who has actually outperformed the benchmark over a 5+ year period without just getting "lucky."

---

#Today is dead cat bounce because we were super oversold and RSI was too low. Starting tomorrow the dumping resumes. LMAO🤌

---

Looks more like a bull anus destruction inverted fair value gay flag Morningstar bearish wedge rsi formation

---

Imagine going short AFTER the SPY dropped 30 handles from early Wednesday to Friday night. RSI was pegged out.

---