No, they don’t, because they are sell-side advisors whose whole job is to make every corporation that hire them look good (because the higher the bankers can push a company’s IPO / selling price, the more they get paid). Bankers are famously the worst investors on the street. I work with them everyday and laugh at the bullshit valuations they churn out.
Her 'returns' are good because they buy leaps in tech which are doing well.
If I have $1M net worth, and spend $100k in tech leaps that go to $200k, have I gained 10% or 100%? People are using the latter to act like she's insider trading
There’s a big bright full moon outside. But it’s super cloudy so you can’t really see it. I interpret that as calls till noon-1 then puts around 2-330. Spy astrology
Sort of. He also get likes $100b for something like a 20% increase over current market cap. Which is the *actual* insane part of this pay package.
I think the $1 trillion part was kind of a distraction so they could trojan horse an insane $100b pay package that is very realistically obtainable. Pretty smart way of doing it.
You're persistently desperate for no reason, I'll give you that, lol
You did get me to finally do the math though, so thanks for that.
I bought at 138 and sold for 441. That comes out to 219.57% , which is better than my back of the napkin guess. It was a good investment 😊