If the product works why do 95% of the largest companies see zero return on their AI investment as per MIT research report. Why does Stanford claim much of the usage in AI results in workslop.
https://www.entrepreneur.com/business-news/ai-workslop-is-a-9-million-issue-stanford-betterup-study/497483
Why did Deloitte get screwed over by garbage ChatGPT hallucinations:
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/oct/06/deloitte-to-pay-money-back-to-albanese-government-after-using-ai-in-440000-report
I thought you said AI is improving. There is zero evidence to show you are correct. It has infact plateaued and no one has figured out how to solve the hallucinations.
Fun fact ORCL isn’t an isolated incident. We will be seeing more and more similar reporting of AI spending failing to return profits, and once the money tap slows down, so will the market. Just read the MIT paper. Or draw on it with crayons a big green line to cancel it out, your choice.
This is almost certainly true but you'll get down voted because Reddit. Many of the smartest people at my work are using AI to help code now, the type of people you talk to and realize how dumb you really are. Or you look at folks like Terence Tao who find AI amazing. Weird how the smart people are making it work while on Reddit it's just complaints. The very same MIT study they're citing says the failing comes from a learning gap for organizations, not the models themselves.
It is hilarious to hear a delivery driver try to bash white collar work. I’m sorry you couldn’t hack it in the corporate world and I hope you are happy on your own path.
I’ll raise your futurism.com article with this MIT one that actually talks specifically about accounting jobs.
https://mitsloan.mit.edu/ideas-made-to-matter/how-generative-ai-can-make-accountants-more-productive