Grocery stocks are still on the menu. AI can’t always eat fake meat. Going long KR, WMK

---

What the KR is?

---

KR 73c 12/5 already says everything, man

---

> ...leapfrog... Lol, hardly. In general, I recommend taking Fast Company with a massive grain of salt, especially when it comes to tech. It's a pretty worthless trash rag. However, the tests are worth looking at, but it's worth knowing that there are many tests for various tasks, and Opus 4.5 doesn't win the most important, e.g.: > Claude Opus 4.5 pushes Anthropic’s reasoning capabilities forward with extended thinking, more stable chain-of-thought execution, and highly reliable tool use. It excels in tasks requiring multi-step logic, structured decomposition, and precise decision-making across long agent workflows. In official benchmarks, Opus 4.5 shows significant jumps in complex problem-solving and coding reasoning compared to Opus 4.1. > Gemini 3, however, achieves frontier-level performance in conceptual reasoning through its Deep Think mode and consistently leads on academic-style benchmarks like Humanity’s Last Exam, ARC-AGI-2, and GPQA. It also displays stronger intuition with abstract patterns and high-level conceptual interpretation, especially in science and mathematics. https://www.glbgpt.com/kr/hub/claude-opus-4-5-vs-gemini-3/ There are lots of other significant differentiators between them, but imo, it's pretty clear that they're the leaders now, but they're diverging in their goals. Imo, Google's goals are ultimately the most profitable, and they have the supporting infrastructure and tools to best leverage and integrate their products. That said, you're clearly more informed than your first comment led me to believe, which means I don't think you'll benefit much more from my help. You keep doing you, mate. You'll do just fine.

---