The following five companies will be added to the Index: Astera Labs, Inc. (Nasdaq: ALAB), CoreWeave, Inc. (Nasdaq: CRWV), Nebius Group N.V. (Nasdaq: NBIS), Rocket Lab Corporation (Nasdaq: RKLB), Teradyne, Inc. (Nasdaq: TER). You're welcome.

---

tbf none of the five companies leaving meet that criteria either

---

rkbl is one of the five new additions to nasdaq-100 toady

---

Five years starting with 50 bucks. Converted to options halfway through. I am now retired. I never buy options. I buy leaps and I sell weekly call options. apparently to everybody else in the sub and they make me a lot of money.

---

Just filled up my tank and 5 five gallon gas jugs. I’m long oil through the weekend market.

---

This literally reads like an ape from five years ago

---

You care because you keep responding and calling me names. Anyways, back to our conversation. Saying Grand Theft Auto is only 30% of Take Two completely misreads the financial mechanics of the company, and honestly, the math is embarrassing. Take Two just wrapped up Fiscal Year 2026 with 6.72 billion dollars in total net bookings. For Fiscal Year 2027, management's official corporate guidance jumps straight to a record 8.0 to 8.2 billion dollars entirely because Grand Theft Auto VI launches on November 19th. That is an absolute, single year leap of up to 1.5 billion dollars in brand new top line scale. Trying to act like an unprecedented multi-billion dollar single product launch equates to a tiny five percent blip in market cap proves you are looking at stagnant, trailing numbers rather than forward looking guidance. Furthermore, you are fundamentally confusing unit sales with structural enterprise value. The reason Wall Street values Take Two the way it does is because of Recurrent Consumer Spending, which just grew 17% and now accounts for an astonishing 78% of the company's entire net bookings. GTA Online is the ultimate high margin engine behind those metrics. When a product beats projections by 20% to 50% in a business model where nearly 80% of the revenue is recurring, high margin digital monetization, it completely restructures the company's long term cash flow profile. Claiming that a stock will go down after an unprecedented 50% earnings beat on the most anticipated entertainment launch in history doesn't just ignore macro factors, it entirely defies the fundamental laws of equity valuation.

---

My bad entirely, you are correct. However, cursing at people doesn’t make your point any more right. Learn how to articulate your points without resorting to it, and people will take you more seriously. Claiming a future fifteen billion dollar projection is perfectly priced in while simultaneously asking why the stock is trading eight percent below its all-time high is a massive logical contradiction. If the market had flawlessly calculated the next decade of revenue, the stock would be completely flat, but its recent five percent spike on a simple pre-order date announcement proves that Wall Street is still actively reacting to new data. The reality is that analysts are notorious for underestimating the long-term monetization tail of premier entertainment franchises. A static spreadsheet model cannot accurately capture premium-tier pricing editions, massive digital storefront margins, or the compounding recurring consumer spending of a next-generation online ecosystem, meaning the true non-linear upside cannot be fully accounted for until the cash is actively hitting the balance sheet.

---