It's just a big bowl that you can fit more crisps/cereal in right? I don't get the hype either. We have some quite big bowls in the cupboard too. Never once have we had a half time show when we used them. Definitely didn't cook any bad bunnies either.
Never. Gross. It’s for lazy, non fit people that don’t work out or care about their health. Imagine some 16 year old, zit faced punk touching his balls and then your food. Yuck.
Maaan....HIMS is getting POUNDED.
Who is left to save Murica?
The guys cant get thier dicks up, the gals can't fit in size 0.
CALLS it is! I STAND FOR HARDDICKS & SLIM CHICKS!
He said he had multiple fidelity accounts and he lost everything and from NOW ON he will get an allowance from his own money (pay check) meaning all his paycheck would be given to his family and his family will give him a small portion to do with it as he sees fit
The actual number is irrelevant. The headlines fit the market movements not the other way around. We'll dump regardless and then if the number is shit then CNBC will say "market lower on sustained inflation numbers" or "market sells off despite lower inflation".
#Ban Bet Lost
/u/Fit-Caregiver-7902 made a bet that SLV would go to 90.0 within **1 week** when it was 77.909 and it did not, so they were banned for a week.
Their record is now 0 wins and 1 losses
[**Join WSB Discord**](https://discord.gg/wsbverse)
> Quick search shows solar cells in space achieve about 30-40% efficiency compared to 20% for terrestrial
That clearly doesn't account for either lack of atmosphere, or the fact that the panel can face the sun 24/7.
> solar cells for space use are orders of magnitude more expensive than terrestrial cells
?? false. They literally need less materials. Don't need casing or glass. Easier to produce. See my other comments. You can fit somewhere between 30-60 racks in a Starship, even with the solar panels and radiators included.
> you're outlining completely disposable data center sats
Yes. That is 100% true. They will be disposable. But think about the fact that GPUs effectively are fully depreciated after 3-4 years anyway by accounting standards.
> expensive supply chains
What is an expensive and bottlenecked supply chain is energy generation on the ground. It's not just expensive on the ground with energy costing 10-20x more, needing giant batteries, more transformers, being a drain on local municipalities, land rights, acquiring and building the buildings, cooling, etc - but the main #1 problem is that the supply chain on the ground **cannot** scale at the pace AI data centers will. Period. Unless we cut the regulations in half overnight for nuclear power, and overnight dedicated hundreds of billions of dollars to increasing the grid by 50% - not happening. Building transformers is a big bottleneck right now. So are batteries, which are needed for large data centers to smooth out usage.
Of course space has issues and drawbacks, but it beats out doing it on the ground long term. Long term being 3-5 years out.
If you are a city/county - are you going to let a data center be built near you? Create a few jobs temporarily, just to have your electricity rates go up 30-50%? No you won't. You'll either tell the AI company to fuck off, or force them to cover the increase price in electricity. Building on the ground is going to get worse and worse.
Acquiring land and building the infastructure needed for data centers will be the bottleneck. Acquiring GPUs won't be the hard part - using them effectively will.
#Ban Bet Won
---
/u/Fit-Frosting-7144 made a bet that NVDA would go to 180.0 within **1 week** when it was 172.47 and it did, congrats you fuckin nerd.
Their record is now 18 wins and 28 losses
[**Join WSB Discord**](https://discord.gg/wsbverse)