once upon a farm

---

Would like to introduce you to your new State Farm agent, Drake Maye.

---

| 2025 | The Fate of Ophelia | Oct 3 | GREEN | | 2024 | I Can Do It With a Broken Heart | Aug 20 | RED | | 2024 | Fortnight (ft. Post Malone) | Apr 19 | RED | | 2023 | I Can See You (TV) | Jul 7 | RED | | 2023 | Karma (ft. Ice Spice) | May 26 | GREEN | | 2023 | Anti-Hero | Jan 27 | GREEN | | 2022 | Bejeweled | Oct 25 | GREEN | | 2022 | Anti-Hero | Oct 21 | GREEN | | 2021 | I Bet You Think About Me | Nov 15 | RED | | 2021 | All Too Well: The Short Film | Nov 12 | GREEN | | 2020 | Willow | Dec 11 | RED | | 2020 | Cardigan | Jul 24 | RED | | 2020 | The Man | Feb 27 | RED | | 2019 | Christmas Tree Farm | Dec 6 | GREEN | | 2019 | Lover | Aug 23 | RED | | 2019 | You Need To Calm Down | Jun 17 | GREEN | | 2019 | ME! (ft. Brendon Urie) | Apr 26 | GREEN | | 2018 | Babe (Sugarland ft. Taylor Swift) | Jun 9 | Closed (Sat) | | 2018 | Delicate | Mar 11 | Closed (Sun) | | 2018 | End Game (ft. Ed Sheeran/Future) | Jan 12 | GREEN | | 2017 | ...Ready For It? | Oct 27 | GREEN | | 2017 | Look What You Made Me Do | Aug 27 | Closed (Sun) | | 2017 | I Don’t Wanna Live Forever | Jan 27 | RED | | 2016 | New Romantics | Apr 6 | GREEN | | 2016 | Out of the Woods | Jan 1 | Closed (Fri) | The Average (Past 10 Years) To calculate the average, only days the market was actually open were counted (21 total release days): * Green Days: 12 * Red Days: 9 * Success Rate: 57.1% Green

---

Opening green. How many of y’all regards are losing the farm anyway today 🤪

---

He was funding[ bitcoin from the start ](https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02425998.pdf) He was asked how he thinks they should re[gulat](https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02365389.pdf)e it in m[ultip](https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02482334.pdf)le [countries](https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02494305.pdf) , a[nd helped with inputs on it's regulations ](https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02636073.pdf) He helped do the [rugpull on coinbase](https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02348176.pdf) \- also funded $XRP and $ALGO for a rugpull [He funded a bot farm / engagement to get it regularly in the news ](https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02266524.pdf) and [also personally helped](https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02585621.pdf) [He has access to a way to de anonymize it over phones and through Tor ](https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02593730.pdf)and [also use this to de-anon it ](https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02517623.pdf) okay

---

We forced Jimmy Carter to give up his peanut farm and this guy is allowed to sue his own government for $10bn in taxpayer dollars. Make it make sense.

---

pepperidge farm doesn't even remember the last time we saw green

---

I wanna volatility farm MSTR but i can’t even get an opportunity because it literally is just going straight to the center of the earth

---

Funny thing is that the biggest thing Elon has talked about "datacenters in space" has been practically tried by Microsoft long ago. Difference is that they've tried it in the ocean. It's much cheaper to design something to be water tight than radiation proof. Biggest issue, heat, is passively conducted to surrounding water and 24/7 power is realistically better done by local wind farm and/or nuclear. This much better concept was still scrapped at the end, how much does "in space" stand a chance besides fooling people in giving away their money.

---

This sums up exactly why data centers in space is stupid. Musk also yapped how he will go to Mars and other scientists just said how stupid that is . Even Neil deGrasse said that if we had the technology to do something on Mars we would have technology to do much better on earth. I am trusting astrophysicist over Musk any day (So you would have heard the obvious news about SpaceX and X. Not convinced by the proposition really. Okay, let's break this down because the idea of putting a datacenter into orbit sounds amazing until you actually look at how space works. First, everyone pictures space as this freezing cold void, perfect for cooling, right? It's actually the opposite. Space is a thermodynamic prison. There's no air, so you can't just blow fans over hot components. All that insane heat from millions of processors has exactly one way out: it has to slowly radiate away as infrared light. To do that on a data-center scale, you'd need to build these gargantuan, delicate radiator panels. We're talking about a structure needing square kilometers of surface area. Like FFS imagine trying to deploy and protect a radiator the size of a small city. One analysis suggested a 5,000-megawatt facility would need about 16 square kilometers of combined solar and radiator area. For scale, that's hundreds of times bigger than the International Space Station's arrays. And that brings us to the second nightmare: space itself is trying to kill your computers. It's flooded with cosmic radiation and solar particles that constantly barrage electronics, flipping bits from 1 to 0 and corrupting data silently. * To fight it, you'd need either massively heavy shielding (which rockets hate) or * you'd have to use specialized, slower, and way more expensive "rad-hardened" chips. So you're either paying a fortune to launch a lead-lined server farm or you're not even getting top-tier computing power up there. Then there's the orbital junkyard problem. Low Earth Orbit is already cluttered with debris - old satellite parts, flecks of paint - all zipping around at about 15,000 miles per hour. Your sprawling, kilometer-wide radiator complex would be sitting in a cosmic shooting gallery. A collision with a piece of debris the size of a marble would be catastrophic, potentially creating a cloud of fragments that could take out the whole structure. But the real dream-killer is the sheer, absurd economics of it all. Let's talk launch costs. Even with reusable rockets, it's brutally expensive. At a rate of roughly $1,500 per kilogram, just launching a single, standard server rack (easily 1,000 kg or more) could cost $1.5 million... and that's before you pay for the actual servers, the solar panels, or the giant radiators. The scale is mind-boggling. One estimate suggested that to replicate just 1% of Earth's total computing capacity in orbit, you'd need to launch over twice the total mass humanity has ever sent to space in history. The numbers just don't close. The capital required would be in the trillions, all to (maybe) save on electricity bills decades from now. Now, is anyone even trying? Sure, in a very small, experimental way. Companies like Sophia Space are working on neat integrated tiles, and whispers of projects like Google's Project Suncatcher aim to send a couple of test chips up by 2027. Or even Starcloud, backed by YC. I think an Indian start-up was also there, TakeMe2Space, IIRC. But I'm not convinced. The smart money is on solving those problems where they exist: better nuclear reactors, advanced geothermal, and just building data centers in cooler places on Earth. The orbital data center is a fantastic backdrop for a sci-fi movie, but for the foreseeable future, that's exactly where it belongs.) stolen

---