Wh y is Apple so behind on their typing ? It takes forever to type on an Apple device. I thought we were going to have robot servants or something this year, and Apple can’t even solve typing on a device 😂😂👏

---

Fundamentals are good on Costco, can weather a downturn or a boom economically speaking. Hit and bounced at current levels of resistance so I’m optimistic. Long term holder, selling covered calls for premiums weekly. Not gonna lie I bought an out of the money put expiring this week in case it barrels down through current resistance levels, but my covered calls more than offset the cost.

---

an ascending triangle only works when Saturn is in retrograde in the first house you idiot like maybe if Mars was descending? but that's a fucking long shot LMAO

---

No, that's exactly how it works for risky assets. Here's a finance 101 puzzle for you : how would you value a contract maturing in a year that gives you an asset valued at X today, but could go up/down 50% in a year? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merton_model This is the 'Strategy' in Micro Strateg, not just yeet dollars into BTC. The idea is that the market values this wrong and they make a tonne of money because of that. Of course it doesn't work if the asset looks more risky than it looked before.

---

Do an ama afterwards

---

Seems like an appropriate lie to me

---

Am i an idiot for loading NFLX 97c Dec 19 Tryna profit off this deal falling through

---

5 years behind Waymo, even if they do this, which is far from guaranteed. It would be one thing if they perfected FSD an could launch robotaxis that are cheaper and deploy to news areas quickly, but we can already see that's not what's happening.

---

I think they have several moats: * They have their own rockets, so their cost is a less than for anyone having to rent launch capacity. This could of course also de facto work out for Blue Origin + Amazon Kuiper/Leo given the shared ownership. * They have built the expensive part (space segment) while there was no competition, so they could expect some "undisturbed" ROI. Now that the space segment is built, a competitor will have to decide whether it's still going to be worth making this massive investment while there already is an established competitor that can possibly undercut your prices to keep you unprofitable. If it is profitable enough to be worth the risk, it's probably going to remain quite profitable for SpaceX too. * They have a huge head start, both in terms of customer acquisition and real-world experience. * Where do you see Blue Origin matching SpaceX's cost to orbit? As far as I could find, an *expendable* Starship launch is estimated to cost around $100M, which would be (even if we assume 100 tons from block 3) $1000/kg. New Glenn (not the 9x4 variant) has launched twice, so I don't think Blue Origin is much further along with New Glenn that SpaceX is with Starship. Starship is definitely well ahead of the 9x4, I'd say. New Glenn isn't intended to be fully reusable while Starship is, and seems to be on track to deliver on that. That'll make it hard for BO to match the launch cost - and even if they do, there's still launch *volume* that's needed.

---

I hope at least an initial pump so i can get rid of these fuck ass calls. I have 650 QQQ 645c expiring on the 15th at a .29 cost basis

---