I guess I just assume there’s diminishing returns on training, like at some point the user won’t really notice a difference right? And I feel like that threshold would be hit long before hardware costs climb to 100b. My understanding of AI is pretty surface level though so I could be wrong.
Edit: I’m struggling to think of a problem that would require this much power to solve which is why I don’t get it. Maybe I’m just not creative though.
No I still havd it. Fully closed the main artery in the leg right in the knee area (sorry I'm not a doctor and english isn't my native tongue - i mean the vein that brings blood TO the leg - artery, right?). First of all I got blood thinners - eliquis (it didn't and won't destroy the clot but still helps with blood flow) I started walking more and more. Always as much as pain allowed me. Then I added swimming and rotoped. My collateral veins (not sure how do you call it in english - i mean the smaller veins around the main artery) slowly got bigger and bigger with use and now I have almost the normal bloodflow and can even run. Yes I feel it sometimes and the leg doesn't "feel right" but it went from "please amputate my leg" to "eh I think I'll take some painpills today maybe" in two years time. When doctors saw how it went better they even offered me some meds that helps with the process of those veins getting better - I tried it but I got brutally sick from it so I stopped quickly. In the end I didn't really need those meds.... Also I lost a lot of weight with diet so the leg carries less - also helped altough according to the doctors it's like 25% of the effect at most (still worth it though).
However my case was almost miraculous as I hear. What helped was that I diligently worked on it (I've got huge motivation in form of two small kids), I was a tourist - I had strong veins in my leg already, I really lost weight (a lot of it and didn't get it back) and I'm relatively young (36 now).... All in all I'm almost ok now and in essence it should help most people in this specific condition.
Hope this helps... If you have similar problem and want to discuse it more, PM me.
Edit: Also sorry I don't remember the other meds (I took them for like a week and vomited several times a day) but I'll try and look around or ask the doctor what it was when I'm going for a check up.
Companies are fundamentally valued by how much cash you can pull out over their lifetime.
The lawyers going for shares instead of cash means one thing: they couldn’t go for cash, because it wasn’t there, because $tsla as an Elon Musk popularity derivative equity is always going to be more valuable than Tesla the car manufacturers or Tesla the “automation solvers”.
Tesla is a cult of personality. Beware making investment decisions based on whatever TA factors derived from knowledge of how other equities have behaved in the past. This is a different kind of asset than a typical stock- it may be a fruit, it may be round, hell it might even grow on a tree. It’s still no AAPL.
If you eat an orange based on whether or not it looks like a tasty apple you will choke on the peel.
(Btw I am bullish on Tesla, but not because it’s an undervalued stock. I just think Elon is a great marketer)
Ok here's the plan for the rest of the year given the new "mercy rule" on stocks.
All Dec strikes
TSLA 165c edit: will just announce more new ev's
AAPL 170c edit: more buybacks
DJT 45c edit: I mean.. cmon.. you have to ask?
Basically the way I see it given the current macro economic environment none of these stocks will go below those strikes ever again based on the previous earnings and socio political conditions.
See ya on the moon!
**Read the goddamn link you regarded imbecile**
I know you're all a lazy bunch of cucks who can't count past 7 let alone do 5 minutes of research which is why I did it for you
Edit - you know what how can I expect you to click on the link and read a few paragraphs. Here ya go idiot
**Finally, I know people love to say they are cooking the books but the reality is they just have a different business model than most used car sellers. Carvana packages up their loans and sells them as securities and their gross per unit of wholesale cars is just added to their retail profit. CarMax, by comparison makes most of it's money from their own financing arm keeping those loans on their books. Carvana adds the sale of financing as profit per unit, CarMax does not. The front end gross profit is similar between the two but reported quite different.**
I don’t know. I’m inversing the sub on this one. I understand the sentiment, but I think this is a good long term hedge against any geopolitical problems. It’s a gamble, but I think this either trades sideways forever and I collect dividends like a boomer, it pays off in a few years because they turn things around, or the world is fucked and intel is the only way we can get chips made on this side of the pond. That’s within my risk tolerance.
Edit: and I’m hedging with MSFT, NVDA, AAPL, AMD.