I trade with price action and correlations. (Checking big indexes vs sub indexes vs volatility vs bonds, etc) (checking energy vs metals vs agriculture vs USD, etc) (checking China vs europe vs US vs emerging vs developed, etc) (checking small caps vs mid caps vs large caps, etc) (checking staples vs tech vs utlities vs discretionary vs industrils, etc) I can deem more info from all of the big picture indexes on my trading personally because I swing trade trends over days and weeks and months and years. My Tradingview charts would be useless though on intraday and kinda even intraweek trading. I've tried signals and candlesticks and metrics and quick trades but that shit doesn't work for me. It's calculus and I'm in American kindergarten. I do admire you folks that successfully do it though, but I'd rather develop my plans over days and weeks at my leisure, rather than me glued to the screens for any single trade.

---

At a certain point, you can kind of do it intuitively, but not without a general idea of levels, like you'll start to recognize the difference between price action indicating a breakout, vs false breakout, just how fast it's moving, indicating more volume vs last week u were watching it tread that same price point. However always good to confirm with other indicators. And the intuitive part takes years to develop. No matter what though, the more data u have to confirm always better imo. Another thing is, watching price action, are dips being bought up fast? Are rips being shorted into, or are they being caused by shorts or MM regedging higher? Indicators are just extra data, that most of them can be inferred based on PA, again though that takes years. Indicators are just an analysis of price action at the end of the day. Keep in mind price action is a continuous auction. A move in hindsight I think of recently was last Friday we dipped to 660SPY and squeezed shorts from 664-671 then rocketed on euphoria This creates a volume gap where we were due to retest because those weren't actual buyers down at 661-669, they were forced buyers. It's like at an auction someone bids for $500 then another guy comes and bids at 1million, then he goes to try n resell it for 1million bc it auctioned at 1mill. That's creating false demand, reseller can only show one person wanted it for 1mill everyone else wanted it for 500. Sloppy example but makes sense in my head

---

At this point, though, golds actual intrinsic value (assuming we lived in a world where its only use was for manufacturing) is something like . 01% of ifs actual value. So one creates 100% of the value from thin air while the other is like 99.99% out of thin air (speculative value vs intrinsic). The difference between the two is basically a rounding error.

---

> The problem with the gold standard is it ties your money supply to a single metal with a fairly limited production rate Sounds a lot like the number of bitcoins that the algorithm is supposed to limit. One thing that both gold and bits-on-a-server reflect is the cost of inflation over time with respect to mining that resource. You're measuring input costs over time (labor, machinery[caterpillar vs nvidia], oil or coal or nuclear energy) and what the expected cost of those same inputs are going to be in the future (the "inflation hedge"). Specifically with respect to bits-on-a-server, I don't understand why there are only a few "forks" of the bits-on-a-server product; how entrenched can one coin be vs any other that can be spun-up in a server farm with a fresh numeric seed? Is it just name brand marketing malarkey that supports one product vs another (ie: the bitcoin brand vs the etherium brand)?

---

$RDDT is trading at 15x revenue for a company that is growing almost 50% YOY. Better monetization and strategy can run this up to $3b in revenue in 12 months and it's profitable last quarter... $RDDT Q3 EARNINGS • Sales $584M vs Est. $550M • EPS $0.80 vs Est. $0.52 • EBITDA $236M vs. Est. $196M • DAUs 116M vs Est. 114M Q4 Guidance • Sales $660M vs. Est. $638M • EBITDA $280M vs. Est. $260M Hmmmmm

---

No. Options market has *currently* reached the critical mass where you make more money manipulating the underlying to push options into or out of the money (see the Indian stock market) vs actually investing in the underlying. At the moment, there are only two markets now, options and bonds.

---

I mean, if I had to associate myself with sucking a Bubba off I’d go with Clinton vs all other Bubbas. Playing the odds

---

If Bitcoin Vs back above the weekly 50 by Sunday at midnight I’m not just sucking IM CHOKING on saylors dick. Thank you for your attention to this matter

---

I understand seeing what you COUDLVE made vs what you lost is an insane feeling. But you are still up 50k YTD. Thats a win brother. Don't beat yourself up

---

Buffet vs burry 1 vs 1 ppv event in the making

---