Look I'm not a b**r but we might be topping

---

Lol that's just B-Booking. Your broker is betting against you

---

Why would you drink pasteurized milk? No benefit to the gut and barely any of the nutrition besides calcium and some b vitamins

---

I emailed Berkshire to consider a 10k special dividend on each class b share

---

CPI and reduced fat CPI have been .3% or .4% MoM for the past 6 months If you annualize that (times 12 regard) thats 3.6%-4.8% for 6 months "B-b-but YoY numbers..." yeah those are ghey, they play numbers games with "base effects" where the comparison looks good from the year before but has fuck all to do with how inflation is trending now [https://wolfstreet.com/2024/05/15/beneath-the-skin-of-cpi-inflation-april-after-some-zigs-a-zag-but-6-month-core-cpi-hits-4-0-6-month-core-services-cpi-hits-6-0-both-highest-since-mid-2023/](https://wolfstreet.com/2024/05/15/beneath-the-skin-of-cpi-inflation-april-after-some-zigs-a-zag-but-6-month-core-cpi-hits-4-0-6-month-core-services-cpi-hits-6-0-both-highest-since-mid-2023/) some nice crayon charts for you regards to ponder

---

>but Buffett would rather have too much cash than purchase a bad deal. Where we discover the one fundamental difference between Warren B. and r/wallstreetbets

---

J O E B I D E N

---

To clarify, a majority of *voting* shareholders must ratify the package. The first time this happened, institutions owned about 70% and *always* vote their shares. Currently, about 46% of TSLA is institutional. Getting retail to vote is like getting ... people to vote. With the near-term issues surrounding TSLA, especially of a manically-distracted CEO, it is conceivable this does not pass. However, and more important, is the reincorporation of TSLA to TX from DE. That requires a majority of *all shares to vote* in favor. If the first succeeds and the second fails, then another trip to DE Chancelry is in the near future. Since the DE court voided the $50 B version, I can see the institutions saying "thank you, we will stay here and not move to the wild west where "he needed killin" is still a defense under the law."

---

Ive heard the phrase, I just thought people would use it cause the m/b/t can sometimes be hard to distinguish when hearing them.

---

Serious question: if DFV used the pump-momentum of his tweet to (a) dump old shares or (b) dump shares bought right before his tweet, would that be legal? I mean, he didn’t advertise or promote anything, but he knew it would cause a move. Really curious.

---