BrrrrrrRrrrrrrrrrr
GM logo

GM

General Motors Company

Price Data Unavailable

About General Motors Company

View all WallStreetBets trending stocks

Premarket Buzz
0
Comments today 12am to 9:30am EST


Comment Volume (7 days)
22
Total Comments on WallstreetBets

0
Total Comments on 4chan's biz

View all WallStreetBets trending stocks

Recent Comments

They have been wrong since a long time The only good call was GM Everything else is a waste
Real short DD: Altman and energy, Altman and Musk are the top names in the tech world, he can pull an insane amount of strings to get approved and get clients. Nuclear energy becoming more and more accepted. Jerk DD: It's going to pop like DJT and QS did years ago, QS had no product for like 5 years but was valued more than ford and gm combined for a week
That is definintely a fair question - lots of industry leaders have fallen to other players over the years. It's just less likely when you have such a large, efficient operation. As much as this board hates Musk/TSLA, they are still incredibly profitable. They actually make money on their cars (approx $15k per vehicle) and they do have some of the most sophisticated production techniques in the world. Contrast that to GM/Ford that lose insane amounts of money on each EV they sell. They are literally using SUV/Truck money to subsdizie their EV sales to meet EPA targets. Otherwise they would have already folded. However, there is always a chance that TSLA ends up in the EV graveyard. But taking into consideration all factors, it just seems less likely. [Ford Lost $36,000 For Every Electric Vehicle Sold Last Quarter, So Was Toyota Right? - The Autopian](https://www.theautopian.com/ford-lost-36000-for-every-electric-vehicle-sold-last-quarter-so-was-toyota-right/#:~:text=This%20means%20that%20Ford%20lost,billion%20for%20its%20EV%20unit.)
serious question; why does Tesla HAVE to be a survivor? it's not like they have a boatload of experience (see Toyota, GM, Ford) as a successful auto maker. it seems far more plausible to me that the big auto makers will simply buyout the company/tech that makes EV demand spike (whatever that is, solid states, semi solid state, some other development) and then use their decades of auto maker experience to dominate the market. I don't think Tesla's battery tech is gonna peak the EV market as is. so why would we be betting on Tesla pivoting battery tech and also becoming a successful auto maker, rather than a successful auto maker just buying the tech that shows it's can scale to production
GM sir, can I interest u in a play with little to no potential upside and every chance of sustaining significant losses?
I see I see, GM at Wendys
Warrens getting old he sold tsm and byd too and they r still decent buys he sold gm too . He cares about fixed income not growth and having cash in hand . In 10 years aapl will be still be around trading at a decent value pairing a decent dividident . Buy aapl hold it but make sure it’s a small part of a portfolio
I made 100k working at dominos as a driver and gm
Read Warren buffets book. They invest in companies with durable competitive advantage. They stay away from dumb companies like airlines and car companies (e.g., GM, Ford, etc.)
View All

Next stock GME

Previous stock GLW